Kotlin Data Classes vs Regular Classes vs Java Records
Let's get started
Kotlin Data Classes vs. Regular Kotlin Classes
Boilerplate Reduction
A regular Kotlin class doesn’t automatically generate utility functions. So we will not have the methods like equal(), copy()... to perform some operations.
// Example class definition
class User(val id: Int, val name: String, val email: String)
// This class compiles fine, but if you check for equality:
val u1 = User(1, "Alice", "alice@example.com")
val u2 = User(1, "Alice", "alice@example.com")
println(u1 == u2) // false
Even though the contents are identical, these are different object instances. So the equality check will return false. But if we define as data class, the equality check will return true. Because data classes are checking the value based equality.
Auto Generated Functions
| Feature | Regular Class | Data Class |
|---|---|---|
| equals() / hashCode() | Manual implementation | Auto-generated |
| toString() | Generic object string | Readable printout |
| copy() | Must clone manually | Built-in |
| componentN() | Not available | Destructuring supported |
Mutability vs. Immutability
Regular Kotlin classes often use mutable properties (var):
class Item(var name: String, var price: Double)
Data classes often emphasize immutability, using val:
data class Item(val name: String, val price: Double)
Immutable data structures help prevent unexpected side effects — especially useful in threaded or reactive systems.
Kotlin Data Classes vs. Java Records
Java Records are introduced with Java 16 and it brought a similar concept to Java to declare immutable data holders.
Java Record Example
public record User(int id, String name, String email) {}
And this automatically generates below methods similar to Kotlin:
Kotlin data classes and Java records common features
User u1 = new User(1, "Alice", "alice@example.com");
User u2 = new User(1, "Alice", "alice@example.com");
// And check for equality
System.out.println(u1.equals(u2)); // true
Just like Kotlin data classes, the equality is based on field values in Java Records.
Differences of Kotlin Data Classes and Java Records
| Feature | Kotlin Data Class | Java Record |
|---|---|---|
| Mutability | Flexible (val or var) | Immutable (fields are final) |
| Copy support | Built-in copy() | Must manually create new record |
| Destructuring | (componentN()) | Not supported |
| Inheritance | Cannot inherit (final) | Can implement interfaces |
| Custom methods | Freely add methods or computed properties | Allowed, but all fields remain final |
| Target Ecosystem | JVM, Android, Multiplatform | JVM only |
Copy method Comparison example
Kotlin:
// Data class definition
data class User(val id: Int, val name: String, val email: String)
// copy method usage
val updatedUser = User(1, "Alice", "alice.new@example.com")
val copiedUser = updatedUser.copy(name = "Alice Updated")
println(copiedUser) // User(id=1, name=Alice Updated, email=alice.new@example.com)
Java:
// Record definition
public record User(int id, String name, String email) {}
User updatedUser = new User(1, "Alice", "alice.new@example.com");
// No copy() method; manual reconstruction:
User copiedUser = new User(updatedUser.id(), "Alice Updated", updatedUser.email());
System.out.println(copiedUser);
Both Kotlin data classes and Java records move developers toward immutable, declarative data modeling, reducing clutter and focusing on readability and correctness.
Comparisation Table
| Feature | Kotlin Data Class | Java Record |
|---|---|---|
| Mutability | Optional | Immutable only |
| copy() | Yes | No |
| Destructuring | Yes | No |
| Use Cases | Android, Multiplatform, JVM | JVM-based |
| Generation | Compiler-generated | Compiler-generated |
| Flexibility | High | Moderate |
That is all.
Burak Hamdi TUFAN